You are not logged in.

Dear visitor, welcome to SPRINKLER TALK FORUM - You Got Questions, We've Got Answers. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains how this page works. You must be registered before you can use all the page's features. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.


New Member

Posts: 6

Location: Houston


Wednesday, February 13th 2013, 3:18pm

Amusing: 26 stretches (reasons) of why RP backflows should be banned.

In researching RPZs, I found the following web site (link below.) It is by a group of people evidently trying to fight backflow preventer requirement in their area.

I cant believe these people would seriously make these claims (for example they claim RPZ and other backflow devices are against Homeland Security Laws because they make it easy for terrorists to inject toxins into our water supply, so if you put one on your house you are aiding terrorists) but I guess they thought/think it will persuade lawmakers. Anyway, I found it amusing and wanted to share:

This post has been edited 2 times, last edit by "nine9s" (Feb 13th 2013, 3:25pm)


Supreme Member

Posts: 5,292

Location: Metro NYC


Wednesday, February 13th 2013, 3:48pm

That webpage (that link actually works) is somewhat amazing. Don't ever hire that guy based on his ability to present a reasoned argument.

Rate this thread