It isn't a buyer preference on a controller. It's a home inspector, who is likely to know the difference between a piece-o-crap controller you got for less than $100 and a Hunter I-Core .OK, search is over. I stumbled onto this:
http://www.bluespray.net
This is exactly what I'm talking about. Unlimited programs, unlimited start times. Configurable seasons means I can set different watering schedule for each season and off for the winter season.
mrfixit,
firmware/software upgrade isn't necessarily for problem fixing. They contain improvement as well. That means the controller is getting better.
Wet_Boots,
A full installation is $5000, but you can buy a minimal sprinkler controller for $100. If I were to sell my house, I don't mind buying a $100 controller if the buyer prefers, and I'll keep my IC or BlueSpray.
BlueSrpay supports rain sensors. I like moisture sensor better, but I can't find a moisture sensor that is reliable and practical. Besides, my system does not have wiring for moisture sensors.
It isn't a buyer preference on a controller. It's a home inspector, who is likely to know the difference between a piece-o-crap controller you got for less than $100 and a Hunter I-Core .
So you now can enjoy a controller with unlimited everything. That comes with unlimited ability to generate conflicts that must be resolved. And resolving unlimited potential for conflicts gets you back to the endless operating manual that makes the ESP-SMT so unloved.
And again, tell the world why individual programs for each zone is not possible on a conventional controller. That you don't see them is an indication that they are probably more a burden than a blessing.
Lawn watering isn't made optimal by a controller alone. It will require sensors, for weather and soil moisture.
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Wet_Boots" (Nov 28th 2012, 9:50am)
When dealing with weather, nothing is exact. Close enough approximation is good enough. I know many people just set their controllers to a fixed schedule all year round and never bother to change. I was that way too, until it rained less and the water bills hiked. But programming a sprinkler controller is such a chore that it is the least favorite thing to do. I think this is the reason why people would just rather waste the water.Only sensor control allows you to "set and forget" - everything else is approximation, no matter what the controller programming is, and as you noted, sensors are not perfect.
By the way, it is curious you would mention seasonal adjustment of all watering times, because your 'perfect' controller would have already taken everything into account, and no need would then exist for a Seasonal Adjust