You are not logged in.

Reply

Dear visitor, welcome to SPRINKLER TALK FORUM - You Got Questions, We've Got Answers. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains how this page works. You must be registered before you can use all the page's features. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

Attention: The last reply to this post was 513 days ago. The thread may already be out of date. Please consider creating a new thread.

Message information
Message
Settings
Automatically converts internet addresses into links by adding [url] and [/url] around them.
Smiley code in your message such as :) is automatically displayed as image.
You can use BBCode to format your message, if this option is enabled.
Security measure

Please enter the letters that are shown in the picture below (without spaces, and upper or lower case can be used).

The last 9 posts

Friday, May 24th 2013, 6:12pm

by electrifiedmale

To the original poster...

I think the point you might be missing is why would you want to replace the whole valve anyway?

The only real reason to replace the whole valve is if the body of it cracks and starts leaking. Or maybe if you just decide someday to use a different make and model, in which case it probably wouldn't matter how the valve you have now is configured or installed because a different make and model wont exactly fit anyhow.

As far as replacing because of failure, a pro who does sprinkler for a living would just take the top off and replace the internal parts which effectively results in a new valve. That makes perfect sense to me and no doubt the least troublesome and most efficient way in both cost and time of repairing one.

Friday, May 24th 2013, 11:55am

by camner

That was me in the other post.
Door number 2 get's my vote.
Go ahead and use unions if you wish. Some people like them. If installed correctly they could go forever without leaking.
I have to warranty everthing I install. I've been around a long time. I know what leaks and what problems can arise from what.
I'll say it again, it's just one more place for things to leak...

With slip ports yes your only option is to cut the pipe if the whole valve needs replacing.
With threaded ports you can unscrew the valve.
With unions you can have all kinds of problems and leaks. Things in the ground will shift around much more than the plumbing in your house.

This is just my opinion. I didn't read this anywhere. 18 years and counting repairing sprinkler systems is where my insight comes from...

If the unions give you a problem you can always redo it. I say go for it.

I hope other people give their opinions as well.


Well, it's exactly your 18 years of experience that I'm hoping the take the wisdom from!

Sorry if I'm being dense here (quite possible), but if one has FPT ports on the valve and then one uses a MPT x slip connector to the PVC, one still has to cut the pipe to get the valve out, right?

Or are you talking about MPT ports on the valve and then a swivel x slip (isn't that effectively a union?) connector to the PVC?

Thanks again.

Friday, May 24th 2013, 12:01am

by mrfixit

That was me in the other post.
Door number 2 get's my vote.
Go ahead and use unions if you wish. Some people like them. If installed correctly they could go forever without leaking.
I have to warranty everthing I install. I've been around a long time. I know what leaks and what problems can arise from what.
I'll say it again, it's just one more place for things to leak...

With slip ports yes your only option is to cut the pipe if the whole valve needs replacing.
With threaded ports you can unscrew the valve.
With unions you can have all kinds of problems and leaks. Things in the ground will shift around much more than the plumbing in your house.

This is just my opinion. I didn't read this anywhere. 18 years and counting repairing sprinkler systems is where my insight comes from...

If the unions give you a problem you can always redo it. I say go for it.

I hope other people give their opinions as well.

Thursday, May 23rd 2013, 9:06pm

by camner

A followup question (or more..)

If one uses glue and fittings, there seem to be three approaches about how the valve attaches:

1. Use a valve with slip connections and glue the lateral and supply lines directly to the valve.

2. Use a valve with FPT connections and use a MPT x slip connector to connect to the laterals and supply lines

3. Use a valve with some kind of swivel connection (or a union)

On another post, some responder wrote: Just glue everything. I can't stand unions. It's just one more place for it to leak. I do prefer threaded valve ports vs slip though.

I don't understand how #1 and #2 are functionally different. Both require the valve to be cut out if it needs to be replaced.

#3 seems most convenient in terms of maintainability; the valve can simply be unscrewed and replaced. I don't understand why unions aren't desirable...they're used all the time in indoor plumbing, no? Is there something different about their suitability in sprinkler systems?

Another questions re valves: How useful are the features of flow control and bleeder valves?

Thanks again for everyone's time.

Tuesday, May 14th 2013, 7:48pm

by Scott76

Use glue and fittings versus any prebuilt things.

Tuesday, May 14th 2013, 9:29am

by camner

Thanks both for your responses.

I assume that the advice would be "build your own using glue and fittings" vs. PVC-Lock type glueless products available from (at least) Orbit and Hydro-Rain?

Monday, May 13th 2013, 9:43pm

by Scott76

I personally think building it is easier than using the prebuilt manifolds. I have multiple personal reasons for liking it, which I don't see a point in sharing. I think cost wise, it's cheaper to build your own, but that depends on if you mess up a time or two.

Monday, May 13th 2013, 8:45pm

by electrifiedmale

manifold is real easy to build. you will come out quite a few dollars ahead by building it.

Hint, if you have six valves, split em up into 2 manifolds in 2 valve boxes. the typical 19 x 14 size valve box for 20$ will only hold 3 valves comfortably. Bigger valve boxes get real expensive real quick when you start trying to put more than 3 valves in em.

Monday, May 13th 2013, 5:19pm

by camner

build your own manifold vs. prebuilt

I'm pretty handy and have done my own sprinkler system repairs (but nothing too extensive), but I've never built a manifold. I'd like to replace some old individual valves each in their own small box with a manifold in a single box. Obviously, SW here has prebuilt manifolds (up to 4 valves, though I presume if I want 6 I can connect two 3s or one 4 and one 2), or I can try to build my own.

Aside from whether I'm more likely to screw it up (more than possible), are there advantages one way vs the other?