You are not logged in.


Dear visitor, welcome to SPRINKLER TALK FORUM - You Got Questions, We've Got Answers. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains how this page works. You must be registered before you can use all the page's features. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

Attention: The last reply to this post was 2166 days ago. The thread may already be out of date. Please consider creating a new thread.

Message information
Automatically converts internet addresses into links by adding [url] and [/url] around them.
Smiley code in your message such as :) is automatically displayed as image.
You can use BBCode to format your message, if this option is enabled.
Security measure

Please enter the letters that are shown in the picture below (without spaces, and upper or lower case can be used).

The last 2 posts

Wednesday, February 13th 2013, 3:48pm

by Wet_Boots

That webpage (that link actually works) is somewhat amazing. Don't ever hire that guy based on his ability to present a reasoned argument.

Wednesday, February 13th 2013, 3:18pm

by nine9s

Amusing: 26 stretches (reasons) of why RP backflows should be banned.

In researching RPZs, I found the following web site (link below.) It is by a group of people evidently trying to fight backflow preventer requirement in their area.

I cant believe these people would seriously make these claims (for example they claim RPZ and other backflow devices are against Homeland Security Laws because they make it easy for terrorists to inject toxins into our water supply, so if you put one on your house you are aiding terrorists) but I guess they thought/think it will persuade lawmakers. Anyway, I found it amusing and wanted to share: